Talk:Ridley

Cleanup
I've marked this article for a cleanup due to the jarble in the paragraphs. Lots of information I've never heard of in this article, so if you find sources that confirm these things, please put them in the article, even a link to a website is fine. I'll work on it later.--Richard 21:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Why Ridley's Clone Doesn't Have Memories in Other M
Because this has been quite a hot topic and people have gotten all hot and flustered when they realized they were wrong about it, I'll be taking a moment to clarify the evidence of why this new Ridley doesn't remember anything the original Ridley knew.

Cloning
Clones are not magical reincarnations of the original. It's not an asexual reproduction like an amoeba. In fact, the closest thing to cloning is actually having a child. Just... It's your genetic duplicate. While the clone will have an almost exact pattern of growth, and some predestined personality, the events that it grows up with are not the same. Say, Original Bruce Wayne saw his father shot right in front of him and vowed vengance on all evildoers; Bruce Wayne Clone (cloned after the traumatic event) will now have a predisposition for disliking injustice, but will not remember that Clone Dad was shot. Which brings us to...

Memories
Memories are images, sometimes sounds, that we can playback in our head. Much like a harddrive (but without the immediacy), the brain can fetch and retrieve 'data' it's stored. However, this data must first be stored. Sure, we can create data, and even implant data, but you need such data from a source. Now let's say we have drives HDR 1 and HDR 2. They're both the exact same model and have the same energy efficiency and RPM, but they have never shared data, with all data being stored in HDR2. Suddenly, Bruce Wayne destroys HDR 2, just when the User decided to move data onto HDR 1. The User CANNOT use Magic Missile to transfer the data had been destroyed to HDR 1, because there is no Magic Missile Drive. That data is gone for good.

Overall
As you apply these, Ridley Clone, as a new baby, would have no memories of his past life. The Galactic Federation could not implant his memories into his clone, even if they wanted to, because they A) didn't know it was Ridley and B) didn't have a copy of Ridley's memories.

However, it would be noted that he retains his predisposition towards intelligence and sadistic tendencies, which are demonstrated in Other M when he:


 * lured a scientist into his holding pen by playing possum


 * used Samus' powers and the Kihunters' natural 'defend hive' programming to get himself some honey


 * assessed and targeted the largest threat, Samus, as well as laid a trap for her

These bullet points absolutely imply Ridley's predatorial prowess. Ridley is, genetically, a sadistic cunning hunter.
 * took joy in Samus' fear, creeping closer and roaring ferociously instead of simply moving in for the kill.

Again, there is no proof that Ridley remembers Samus. The aforementioned bullet points only demonstrate predatorial prowess, NOT memories. Extraxi 07:41, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Inconsistencies
Now say Ridley does somehow remember Samus. It'll be time for those two, and us, to take a ride on the Inconsistency Train.

If Ridley remembers, then why doesn't everything scraped off Samus' armor remember? In the two possibilities of everything flying off the handle when A) Ridley was cloned or B) MB had a fit, nothing hits the fan until one of those do. If all the monsters had be cloned in a way that somehow forced genetic memory by use of the Animus, why wouldn't the Zebesians rise up long before MB or Ridley came about?

And the Zebesians, as well as the Metroids, were the prime targets of this cloned army. Ridley was an accident, and was treated as a pet, not continually made into a weapon. How would he, with no special treatment, somehow get magical benefits of cloning?

It simply doesn't pull together. Extraxi 08:49, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * That's fine Ex, but your opinions aren't going to dominate the page anyways, both sides will be put up. 173.215.223.164 14:17, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Unfortnately, I didn't lay out opinions. If you wish the other side to be put up, then explain, in detail, how the inconsistences become irrelevant, and the methods in which this new Ridley somehow regained memories independant of all the Zebesians. Remember, even with his 'regenerative ability', he can't regenerate something he never had; memories of a past life. Extraxi 22:45, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

i don't know how this message got deleted, but i said that this made me realize ridley doesn't have memories, but you should check out what admiral just said near the bottom. 68.169.40.21 00:29, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Timeline
We need a reason why Ridley is fully organic again in Super Metroid. I have made 4 possible timeline theories for Ridley after his first encounter with the Hunter:

Timeline A: (Ridley going to Tallon IV) 1. Ridley 1 is defeated (not destroyed) in the Ridley Area on Zebes during Zero Mission. 2A. When the Zebesian Pirates split in two groups (or possibly more, as there are still 2 frigates whose fates are unknown) after the Fall of Zebes, the group that went to Tallon IV took Ridley (who might have been heavily wounded) with them. and fixed them with their cyborg technology, creating Meta-Ridley. 2B. The Zebesian Pirates started cloning Ridley, the DNA samples they used for this might have been from before or after his initial defeat on Zebes. 3. The Hunter attacks Orpheon, and Meta-Ridley is forced to flee to Tallon IV. Meta-Ridley is defeated through the combined effort of the Hunter and the Chozo statues. Meta-Ridley falls into the Impact Crater, and most likely escaped while Aran was fighting Metroid Prime in the Impact Crater. 4. MP3C happens, and this Ridley is completely destroyed. (will not tell anything else due to spoilers) 5. Super Metroid: The successfully cloned Ridley from Zebes attacks Ceres and steals the last Metroid. He MIGHT have been completely destroyed in this game, either from his battle with the Hunter or the destruction of Zebes, although I think it's not likely, as the Federation apparantly has a frozen Ridley on the BSL research station, this Ridley might have been another clone, though.

Timeline B: (Ridley staying on Zebes, as it was intended before Prime) 1. Same as above. 2A. When the Zebesian Pirates split in two groups (or possibly more, as there are still 2 frigates whose fates are unknown) after the Fall of Zebes, the group that went to Tallon IV took some DNA samples of Ridley with them, cloned him and altered him with cyborg technology; creating Meta-Ridley. 2B. The Zebesian Pirates kept the Original Ridley. 3. Same as above. 4. Same as above. 5. Super Metroid: The Original Ridley from Zebes attacks Ceres and steals the last Metroid. He MIGHT have been completely destroyed in this game, either from his battle with the Hunter or the destruction of Zebes, although I think it's not likely, as the Federation apparantly has a frozen Ridley on the BSL research station, this Ridley might have been another clone, though.

Timeline C: -All Ridley's are clones (Zero Mission one might have been the origibal, though).

If one of the theories above were to be true, it is unknown why the High Command didn't just order an army of Ridleys to be made, thus making any other means of conquest (through Metroids, Phazon or the base on Zebes) unneccesary.

Timeline D: -As stated in the article, all Ridley's are the same entity, save for Ridley-X, which is a X-clone of the frozen Original. Although the "massive phazon exposure from the explosion recreates his organic tissue" is highly unlikely, I don't see any other way of him surviving everything. Maybe his Meta-Ridley armor was removed or something?


 * Woah, long post. However, I'm sorry to say but theories aren't really helpful. If we could find info from Nintendo or something, then we could put it in the article. For all we know, these are all the same Ridleys. However, we'll never know unless Nintendo officially confirms this. Nice timelines though.--Richard 01:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

The reason Ridley is organic again is because he eats other organisms to rebuild his organic body. I forgot where I heard this, but I know it to be true. SA-X96 20:23, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I know I heard it on the main page of this article. It says that that fact is said in the Manga. DoomZero 20:32, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, that is where I heard it. One day, I got really bored, so I read all the manga about Samus' beginning. Thanks! SA-X96 23:14, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

Ridley>Meta Ridley>Omega Ridley
According to Metroid: Zero Mission, Meta Ridley is the Final Boss when Samus tries to escape Zebes after her ship is shot down. As this is a more recent game, it should supersede the information in Metroid and thus Meta Ridley's first creation and appearance is as the final boss in Metroid: Zero Mission and should be edited as so. I also believe that the Meta Ridley seen throughout Metroid Prime is meant to be the same Meta Ridley as seen at the end of Metroid: Zero Mission after escaping the base there on Zebes.

As an explanation as to why he is normal again in Super Metroid, it is partially explained at the end of Corruption that after destroying all the Phazon from its original source everything it infected returns to normal as before. As Ridley only survived due to merging with the Phazon during Corruption it is logical to assume that once it was removed he was revived in his original form, similarly to how Samus returns to normal as well. He was either fully rejuvenated or quickly received medical attention, in either case he returned to his original self.


 * Actualy Mecha Ridley is the last boss of Metroid Zero Mission. There is several differences between the two. The major difference is that Mecha Ridley is a robotic version of Ridley (a fake to say it quickly) and Meta Ridley is a cyborg (Ridley combined with robot parts). MarioGalaxy2433g5 21:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Temporary Suggestion
As done on many other wikis that require explanation that the creators are not providing, someone could find a Metroid forum and place theories from forums (not me, I can't find any) to how Ridley became organic again. Darqlink51 01:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Geoform 187
I was going through the Metroid Prime logs, and I found one Space Pirate log that looks very interesting. It says Ridley is a codename for 'Geoform 187', a little about Meta Ridley, and that Meta-Ridley is the 'mainstay of security'. Does this mean Ridley wasn't the leader of the Space Pirates? Are there 186-plus some other huge scary guys like Ridley and Kraid?...and how come no one else noticed the scan?--1upD 02:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


 * We noticed the scan, it is just we never said anything. Darqlink51 clearly noticed it, he made a redirect for Ridley named Geoform 187. Also Kraid could have been one of the 186 before Ridley. Also Ridley's place as leader has been disputed ever since Prime came out. MarioGalaxy2433g5{Metroid/Mario Admin} {talk/contribs/Logs} 19:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I noticed it too,i wandered the same thing like Kraid,it keeps me wandering if theres like 187 of these things like him why cant they afford to lose him and always bring him back?I just think because with all the oppressive forces like the Galactic Federation and possibly the Ki-Hunters that they cant really afford to lose him,187 is not a big number even if they are huge and tough.

Anyone ever thought that maybe the pirates did expirements to enhance creatures with mechanical parts, similar to what they did with phazon? Ridley could be the 187th expirement. The Exterminator 00:05, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
 * Weird. "Geo" means "of the earth". The MarioGalaxy2433g5  { talk /contribs/Logs} 22:54, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

Shady sources....
The biography for Ridley is highly detailed, and contains a very ample amount of information on Ridley's background. But I have played through every main Metroid game (excluding the final 10% of Corruption) to 100% completion, I've read the first 7 chapters of the E-Manga, and I had never even seen half of the information written there! Could someone please shed some light on the sources of this mysterious information? (Such as the mass extinction program against the "Space Dragons", and Ridley's mission to eradicate chozo inhabitants of Zebes, and so on & so fourth...) Armantula513 03:13, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

'Space Dragon Mass Elimination Program'
Seriously agreeing with Armantula here. Where did most of Ridley's background come from? I was thinking the same thing the other day. This seems like guesswork/fanon. ChozoBoy 18:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It came from a secret inside informer at BSL. 0_o--1upD 18:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * ...thus it should be edited out somehow. -Gamok

So, admins... Are we taking this out (Also on Space Dragon, which I'm not sure is a correct specie name), or are we going to contact the writer for a source first? This all seems very misleading, but I'd hate to remove important information on the off chance that this was from one of the few media I haven't read, like Samus and Joey. ChozoBoy 00:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * All that info is from www.metroidguide.com. I would know; I've read that article. what we need to do is ask nintendo to confirm or deny it. --DekutullaZM 15:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

It's not true. There is a disclaimer at the bottom of the website saying: '''This website has no affiliation with Nintendo ©. All information contained herein is purely fictional.''' It's non canon.--Tuckerscreator 17:38, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I know that. I'm saying that's where the info comes from and that nintendo should tell us "yes, we agree with them, lets make it canon" or "no, that's nonsense, ignore them". --DekutullaZM 21:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Nintendo doesn't need to comment on fan sites. ChozoBoy [ADMIN] (Talk/Contribs) 01:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * If Nintendo has made no comment regarding the canoncity of major works like the 2002 manga, then they're probably not going to speak about websites like this one. The site's own words should be enough.--Tuckerscreator 01:49, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

All right, I surrender. I was just saying that's where I originally saw this thing. If it's non-canon, then take it down. I give. --DekutullaZM 15:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Wait a minute, are you sure it was from this site? While the site does have a lot of speculation and fanon, such as on Ghor's bio, I saw nothing on Ridley's that said that the Federation exterminated his species.--Tuckerscreator 18:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

What?? No! It was metroidguide.com that said that! Or... are you not beating the dead horse? Are you talking about something someone else said?

X
Mabye "Ridley X" Is related to ridley. EX: its his dad. Samusiscool2 00:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This theory has already risen on Talk:Ridley-X. I think the player's default assumption is to think that it is really Ridley who was frozen, but when you think that you forget the possibility that it could be just another Space Dragon. Long Live the Squees! Squee master  01:09, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Possible Based On...
Seeing as I've heard that Metroid is based on the Alien series, I've noticed that some of Ridley's artwork/forms seem similar to the Xenomorph, with dragon-like body parts used for the head and wings. Does anyone else here notice a resemblance. If they do, I may add this to the trivia as a possible influence in his design. Dark Ridley 20:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, i'm starting to notice it too, his chest area has a clear rib cage showing, and the tail. However, the head is exluded, it is simply elongated because Pterodactyls have heads like that, after all he is based on them most. Hell Kaiser ryo12 [ ADMIN ] (Talk&bull;Contribs) 20:49, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Look at the original NES metroid... Ridley looked similar to the Xenomorph, His head was way bigger than the pterodactyls head.(Metroid101 02:31, January 15, 2010 (UTC))

Ridley's last name
I herd his last name is Mc'Macintire and also can ridley speak english?-69.118.78.130 22:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Ridley is scotish? Anyways give us a source on that name and he speaks jappaneese in the E-Manga which as been translated to english so yep.  Metroidhunter32  01:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

If you have IO on demand go on free on demand and go to lifeskool go to video games and select metroid-207.241.247.1 15:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

I didn't know Ridley had a last name. I never really thought of that. Where did you hear that? SA-X96 02:19, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

His last name is probably some numbers, I doubt that his last name is Mc'Macintire, somebody was probably kidding you.--Captain Silver 07:30, January 18, 2010 (UTC)Captain Silver

He wouldn't have a last name, due to Ridley most likely being a codename for his real subject name. I base this on the face that Meta Ridley was a codename for his real name, which was simply Geoform 187. -Serrix

Cold, lifeless eyes?
What exactly is that from? I don't think it's from any of the games..--Shard1697 03:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Dunno. I always remeber him as having rather inteligent eyes and in Metroid Prime it looks like his eyes are actually on fire.  Metroidhunter32  15:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, all the pirates in Prime had flaming eyes. Hellkaiserryo12 16:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I believe this is what one would call artistic license, in the literary sense of the term. It is more of a literary tool meant to evoke feeling than it is necessarily the truth. Aside from that, I think that Ridley has quite a flamboyant pair of spectacles, not devoid of life in the slightest! Armantula513 [ADMIN] (Talk&bull;Contribs) 11:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, in manga, ridley has sort of smart, intellectual eyes. In prime, they are powerful looking and in super metroid they are a softer version of prime's eyes. SA-X96 02:26, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

Zebesian?
In the original manual for Metroid, Ridley is said to be "the original Zebesian" which implied that his species was native to the planet before disappearing for unknown reasons. Could Ridley's species possibly be the Zebesians? The question is: Is the original Metroid manual still canon? One might point out that Metroid Zero Mission was supposed to recon it but its manual actually says nothing about Ridley not being a Zebesian, simply because he was barely mentioned and not even seen in the manual(Kraid held the bigger spotlight for the time being.) The Chozo have already been stated as not being native to Zebes. It seems pretty likely to me that Zebes was Ridley's homeworld, which is why he wanted the planet so much. User:Tuckerscreator 5:26 17 March 2009

Likely retconned. Peegai 11:31, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Other M has me thinking he might be Zebesian as well. At one point Samus finds an alien corpse on the Bottle Ship that looks a lot like Ridley which she says "looks like a Zebesian". The head and body structure do fit appearance wise only difference being it didn't appear to have wings as far as I could tell but given that it seems to have been "modified" at some point it's possible the wings were removed The Krypt Angel 23:54, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pictures
I think we may have too many pictures on this page. I think we may need a gallery.Dark Ridley 03:18, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

SSB
http://mdb.classicgaming.gamespy.com/sb/sbshot_ridley.jpg

Now stop that. Dazuro 01:40, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

We've talked about this before. You cannot continue behaving like this here. Everyone is working together on this wiki and you won't get anything out of acting rude. Now if you don't cite your sources in or during the edit you can't expect anyone to believe it. The sprite is a lot less detailed than Super's and in the original posture, but if you feel strongly enough about it, then that is fine but if I see you treating other users the way you have been treating me then there will be a problem. ChozoBoy [ADMIN] (Talk/Contribs) 02:11, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

You can't be serious. The sprite used is the one straight out of SM, with the tail posed awkwardly. There is no question about that. M1's looks completely different. What, do you want me to start citing the fact that Samus has two legs? Anyone with eyes can see that, just as anyone with eyes can see which Ridley sprite is used. I shouldn't have to cite blatantly obvious things. Why exactly can I not behave like this? What is "behaving like this"? Making constructive, accurate edits to articles, and reverting mistakes made by an incompetent administrator? Funny, I've never heard of anyone objecting to fixing things before. I'll take note to be counter-productive like you in the future, though. Thanks for the tip.

Also, you didn't give any citation at all beyond "this is true". Are you somehow exempt from your own rules just because of your rank? Dazuro 02:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Lower Jaw?
In the 2D ones, he's weak everywhere in his body. In 3D, he's weak to the chest. Where did this "lower jaw" thing come from? Sure, you can stun him by shooting him in the mouth, but that has no specification to his lower jaw. Does he take more damage to his beak-bottom than anywhere else in any game? As far as I know, this is completely meaningless, but in an effort to appease the Wrath of Chozoboy, I'm asking here first. :3 Dazuro 18:44, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm sure it is likely related to Kraid's similar weak-point in that it may do more damage. An illustration in the SM guide depicts firing missiles and super missiles into his mouth, but does not elaboarate on this. Maybe examining some Speed Runs will shed some light. Also, don't be a jerk. If everyone else on every wiki can use a talk page before they amputate half an article, than so can you. ChozoBoy [ADMIN] (Talk/Contribs) 19:01, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Cripes, I can't win. Even when I try to do as you say you bite my head off. -_- What's all that about Kraid? Does he take more damage to the lower jaw than the rest? You said "may do more damage", indicating that you don't mean Kraid's mouth in general, since no where else does any damage... As for "amputating": The point of a Wiki is that anyone can edit it. If an edit is in dispute, it gets discussed and fixed. If we have to okay every minute correction, what's the point of letting anyone but the admins edit anyway? "Hey I found a typo, is it okay if I fix it?" Unless it's something actually debatable, there's no point in debating it. Incidentally, this is debatable, and you'll note that I debated it. But as usual, people only notice when someone does something wrong, failing to ever realize "hey, he's trying". And then you call me a jerk. Dazuro 19:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

I personally disagree with the "lower jaw is his weak point" idea. First of all, Ridley's weak point has generally been his chest, such as in Zero Mission, Prime, and Corruption. Before one points out his health dropping during the first battle on Norion, I would like them to notice a few things. Firsts, Ridley does not exhibit any major death signs after being defeated. I would argue that the battle is essentially one trying to push him to the bottom rather than hitting in a lethal location, kinda like a battle of tug-of-war, only backwards. Even after being defeated in that battle, he still clearly alive, just flailing about, because there is nowhere left for him to grab. As for shooting his mouth to stun in him in the Seed and at the Impact Crater, remember, if you shoot anyone in the mouth, it's going to hurt, but there it only served to stun him, not damage him. Ridley's weak spot is more likely his chest, which makes far more sense. User:Tuckerscreator 14:21 25 April 2009

Safe to Say?

 * Next to nothing is known of his pre-military background (if in fact he even had any), but it is safe to say that he made his way up the ranks until finally he was bestowed the designation as leader of the Space Pirates in battle.

I'm doubtful of this assertion for several reasons:

1. Ridley is a different species than all the other Pirates. I think that the other Space Pirates, even up to High Command itself, would give Ridley special attention the moment he arrived.

2. This is a fan guess, not just about Ridley's history but about Pirate society in general as well.

3. It also claims that there is some hints at his past e.i. "Next to nothing" when there is in fact none.

So we need to fix this User:Tuckerscreator 22:22 08 May 2009

I found it more vague than fanon, but if you want to write a new opening, go ahead. ChozoBoy [ADMIN] (Talk/Contribs) 01:58, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

What do you think it should sound like, then? Any suggestions? User:Tuckerscreator 20:11 10 May 2009

Something representative of the character that introduces him to an audience that might not be familliar (or at least as familliar as we are) with Ridley. By the way is Ridley's gender ever given? ChozoBoy [ADMIN] (Talk/Contribs) 03:29, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

I believe Ridley is referred to as "he" on the Pirate lore for Meta-Ridley. But even if he isn't, his persona both in-game and out very much seem to reflect that of a male. User:Tuckerscreator 22:21 10 May 2009
 * He is refered to as male several times, such as "a job he will take to" and such. As for his species, I dunno--his design in Prime is actually quite reminiscent of the Pirates there, albeit with wings and a tail. And the manga has implied several times that he's one of them by more than just affiliation--and after all, both Prime and the manga show that pirates have no qualms whatsoever with completely reconfiguring their bodies. Maybe he is a different species, but there's not enough evidence either way. Dazuro 05:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

I've always just been under the impression that he is a heavily mutated space pirate from some experiment that not enough pirates survived for it to be cost effective to do again. Same thing with Kraid.  Metroidhunter32  15:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Kraid strikes me as more Bryyonian than Urtragian-based. Dazuro 17:07, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

I always thought of Ridley as a separate species but being amutated Pirate is a possibility I hadn't considered. Above this section, I had given my hypothesis over Ridley being a Zebesian but, so far, no one has responded. User:Tuckerscreator 12:19 11 May 2009


 * While it is possible that Ridley was a mutated Space Pirate, the fact that he was also referred to as "Geoform 187" implies that Ridley is not, speciesially, a Space Pirate. He is a space pirate in terms of affiliation, however.

Zero Mission artwork
Since Zero Mission currently has the most up-to-date artwork of Ridley, shouldn't we use that for the main image rather than the Super Metroid artwork? Looking around the gallery, it doesn't look like it's been uploaded, but I can upload it if need be. -PeanutLord 22:49, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Wouldn't Brawl's be the most recent, not to mention probably the best picture in general? Doesn't seem like we automatically go with 'most recent' like most wikis either. Though either way, if the ZM one isn't uploaded we need it for the gallery, so please do so. Any chance you have the other ZM artworks as well? I've never seen most of them outside of the Brawl stickers--no sites seem to have the stuff. We have a few minibosses and such on the wiki, but AFAIK we have no Ridley, no Kraid, no ZSS, no gunship... Dazuro 23:10, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, I was more referring to his artwork in actual Metroid games...I dunno, it just makes more sense to me since that's the most up-to-date canonical version of his design (not including the Prime games, since they're Meta and Omega instead of just normal Ridley, or Other M, since we don't have any official artwork for it yet). I have most of the Zero Mission artwork, though, so I'll get to uploading that anyway. -PeanutLord 02:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Ridley: Name of the being or the species?
I typically thought that Ridley was his name, but upon reading the details of meta ridley that came from the Nintendo site, which begins with "Meta Ridley is a genetically enhanced Ridley metaform...". The line seems to imply that the species is named Ridley. Any thoughts on this? Dark Ridley 19:52, September 7, 2009 (UTC)


 * That line never struck me as contradictory to the fact that Ridley is the name of the individual. By which he is referred to on multiple occasions anyway. Besides I wouldn't take much of what that site says as canon, if it even exists anymore. It used a horribly outdated image of Metroid Prime. Uncouth! SteveZombie 01:43, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

Ridley, according to a metroid prime log, is a code name for geoform 187. SA-X96 02:40, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

Article Pic
Um, there's nothing wrong with the first infobox pic, but, can we please use something with a little more...awesomeness? -- Deku tulla  ZM  21:40, September 17, 2009 (UTC)


 * Nominations? ChozoBoy [ADMIN] (Talk/Contribs) 06:57, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

-- Deku tulla  ZM  19:15, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Won. ChozoBoy [ADMIN] (Talk/Contribs) 21:04, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Ex-Ridley?
Is it saft to say that ridey is dead, by the end of Fusion? I mean, ofcourse he'll appear in all the games before Fusion, and it won't really matter as long as no other game is released after fusion, but is he deceased? Assuming the frozen corpse is in fact ridley, obviously. The Rid-cicle collapsed, looking quite dead. (By the way, Ex-Ridley is a refrence to the Norwiegian blue parrot from Monty Python.) DoomZero 15:41, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
 * We can't assume he is. If (and only if) there are no more chronological sequels to Fusion, then we can say that. Queen  Sa  mus  18:37, October 4, 2009 (UTC)


 * They couldn't possibly have killled Samus's nemesis. She has to kill him. Still, they have to explain that in a later game.

Like the one coming out next year that takes place in that time period and has Ridley in it, in at least two parts of the game? ChozoBoy [ADMIN] (Talk/Contribs) 03:51, October 5, 2009 (UTC) Woah, close call there. If you had even mentioned the acronym of the game's title, this place would have huge amounts of messages. And anyways, that game takes place before Fusion. DoomZero 03:55, October 5, 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, I actually meant a game that takes place after Fusion. They should make one, along with another one after Corruption.


 * Speaking of after Fusion... What happens to Samus's suit? Like, is she stuck with the Fusion suit forever, now that the Chozo are nowhere to be seen, and the scientists pretty much destroyed her power suit? DoomZero 21:58, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

Remember how the Federation created data that mimicked her previous abilities perfectly? They could do the same thing with her Power Suit, but we're getting off subject. This should be about Ridley, not Samus' Suit. The Exterminator 22:52, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

Hmm... Yeah, you're right... But I don't have anything left to talk about... DoomZero 00:08, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

I heard something once(maybe wikitroid)that the Manga states that Ridley is like Dark Samus and can survive being completely disintergrated because his dead cell/particles spread into the air and feed off other energy and he forms back together.General Q-Nek 01:27, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

Close. He actually eats other organisms, with his mouth, to restore his lost body parts. Supposedly this is how he became Ridley again after the Prime series, all those mechanical parts helped in "rebuilding" his organic form. The Exterminator 01:30, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

Development Room
Where'd these pictures come from? I've seen them on both the Ridley, Kraid, and Chozo pages. What are they? -- Deku tulla  ZM  17:57, November 29, 2009 (UTC)

Concept art from Zero Mission. Don't ask how you get it, I'm still waiting for the dang game to come in. The  Ex terminator  18:17, November 29, 2009 (UTC)

INVINCIBLE (not the Michael Jackson song)
Ridley can absorb 'life energy' from other beings or at least regenerate. He never really dies truly, which is weird. Haha maybe he has Metroid DNA?

TantrumDog 02:30, December 2, 2009 (UTC) TantrumDog


 * As I recall he reveals he consumes dead bodies or cells in some fashion. Many have taken this as meaning he outright eats them but looking at that little accident he was involved in at K-2L, I kinda doubt he was in any condition to do so. SteveZombie 22:50, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

Undead much? Maybe he absorbs their matter and makes/rebuilts himself. TantrumDog 04:06, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

Remember how he's referred to as a geoform, not bioform? This makes me think that Ridley might not be a normal creature and may not be carbon-based, explaining why he's such an abnormality of biology.Einsteinium99 02:47, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Citiation
I'll post a youtube video of all the ridley remixes... I'm starting it now (Metroid101 18:16, February 14, 2010 (UTC))

Metroid manga
If you zoom up on a small pic of Ridley before he tells Samus that he is going to kill her, it kind of looks like he's sorry to kill innocents. Anyone knows why? Brianb014 07:09, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Well, he goes around killing people and animals, then to have a child come to him fearless and trying to make friends. I guess he didnt have the heart to kill a kid standing up to him. Thats why he hesatated, saying "We dont have time for little girls." or something like that. Then when Virginia comes over he blasts her because she was scared. Hard to explain. (Metroid.pie 20:42, June 26, 2010 (UTC))

Maybe it was just a "Sarcastic" look? He does have a morbid sense of humor. Marx Wraith 03:07, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Metroid101
"CHILL OUT!"? I did not get angry at you. -- R o y b o y X {ADMIN} 23:00, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

I didn't get angry at you either, I was just using CAPS to replace italics. Metroid101 23:04, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

M101, in my opinion we ought to allow the category's inclusion. ChozoBoy [ADMIN] (Talk/Contribs) 23:17, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Ridley Speaks
In the E-Manga, it shows that Ridley is obviously able to speak. In the games, however, he cant or just dosent. Though the E-manga isnt true with nintendo directly, do you think he will talk in Other M, with the addition of full voice acting. I'd be cool if he did, i'd flip out, but if he didnt then I guess its not true. Any thoughts on this? (Metroid.pie 13:52, June 25, 2010 (UTC))


 * Well he did "die" many times, that could possibly effect someones speech capabilities. And also this is a talk page, it is for discussing about the article its self and not the subject. If you are going to post something like this again, you should got to the Watercooler< Our forums. Metroid101 13:59, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, well, um. Yeah, ok... What? (Metroid.pie 16:00, June 25, 2010 (UTC))
 * Oh, well, um. Yeah, ok... What? (Metroid.pie 16:00, June 25, 2010 (UTC))

Let's not go there...
I've removed the words "Like a wyvern" from the end of the second to last entry in the Trivia section. The reason being that the appearance of wyverns in itself is very much open for debate, and by that I mean there are a lot of different depictions of wyverns. Anyone remember the old Fox Kids show "Mystic Knights of Tir na Nog"? It featured some creatures called "wyverns" that were nothing more than torsos with wings, a head, and a tail that lobbed energy balls forward. Some depictions of wyverns feature two wings, two legs, and two stubby little T-Rex arms. Hell, whoever wrote that entry might as well have said "like a drake" or "like a male dragon" (I'm reasonably certain that it's universally agreed that all female western dragons have two wings, and and are quadrapedal). 75.107.0.38 06:41, June 26, 2010 (UTC) predcon


 * For one thing, I appreciate your edit because A) Wyverns aren't real (or so we think) and B) We don't know what they look like. But I concur with this statement "I'm reasonably certain that it's universally agreed that all female western dragons have two wings, and and are quadrapedal" ...  Dragon's aren't real or have not had evidence of their existence  ... Also, what you described as a "male" wyvern, is exactly what Ridley looked like in the original Metroid -_- And don't use the terms Male and Female when you're describing things that you act they are real but really that aren't or haven't yet been discovered by modern public xD Metroid101 04:05, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Species revisited
So, I was rereading the manga, and at one point he, Gray and Mother get into a big argument over the nature of his species, lumping him together with the space pirates. "Are you stopping this humanoid charade? After all, this is your people's true nature. You've stolen from every race imaginable. In the end... beasts indulging in your own petty desires." "Beasts? We are..." Clearly, he's being counted as one of the pirates' race, shuzoku, whatever you want to call it. Now, add to this that he was called the original Zebesian, a term which now refers to the pirates. Beyond that, have a look at Ridley's model in Metroid Prime. His chest and limbs are nearly identical in structure and texture (under the armor) as the standard space pirates found in the game. We know the pirates are big on genetic modification and bioengineering, we know they have no qualms changing around their own race's builds and appearances (see the Body Acclimation Machine or whatever it's called)... He looks just like a pirate with wings, a tail and a different head on a long neck. He is referred to and refers to himself as one of their own. And he shares his title with the race's nickname. Is it really that much of a stretch? Also keep in mind that some of the mutated pirates in the manga demonstrate long beaks with reptillian heads... I don't know if it's solid enough to mention in the article as anything more than a trivia if that, but it's worth thinking about. Dazuro 03:46, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

Upon further reading, Mother Brain explicitly says "this worthless species" while looking at Ridley, refers to his "puny race," then goes on to say she will "cradle the space pirates to sleep." Yeah, sounds like confirmation of his race to me. <_< Dazuro 04:22, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure we can rule him out being a direct species of Space Pirate now that we know that he starts out as a furry little white thing with a nasty appetite for anything that moves. Marx Wraith 22:01, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Indeed. Unless of course that's what all baby pirates look like, or then there's that crazy theory on Ridley's page about Ridley's DNA being mixed with the bunny's causing them to evolve from each other... Dazuro 22:11, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

uhhh....wow,behold the terror of the galaxy! The ravenous space bunnies! Marx Wraith 23:39, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Ridley's nature is mysterious, but I don't think he IS a space pirate (in biological terms), but definitly IS a space pirate. What I mean is, his case is similar to being adopted. Though I'm not saying that the pirates went down to the local space dragon shelter. 66.50.175.139 03:20, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Ridley in Other M
Other M reveals a lot about how Ridley works as a species (and it doesn't seem to be very Space Pirate-y) so I figured I just mention this so you guys don't forget to add that.

78.50.30.239 02:39, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

So Ridley seriously starts out a tiny fuzzy thing....creepy.Marx Wraith 03:05, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

I find it ironic and fitting. A fuzzy bird thing is WAY scarier than a baby dragon, suprisingly.

What i don't like his final "classic" form in Other M. They messed up his head and gave him steroids. Land Shark7896 20:13, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

He does look more like a crocodile with that mouth like it is and I was surprised to see how ridiculously muscular he got...mayhap they did pump something into him when he was "Little Birdie", apparently the Space Pirates are smarter when it comes to there being a rule against keeping test subjects as "pets". Little creepy furry gremlin bird-thing,brrrrrrrr! Marx Wraith 21:02, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Incorrect Characterization.
''Early in the game Samus also meets "Little Birdie" but doesn't see it as a threat, so she leaves it alone. Later, she find it eating Kihunter nectar as it roars at her and finds the creature "disgusting" as it relied on the power of others (specifically it used her to kill the Kihunter nest).''

Nothing suggest that Samus found the "young Ridley" disgusting because it had to rely on the power of others.


 * Isn't that what she said? Also, its funny that she says that because Little Birdie is "pirating" off of her kill at a young age. It feigning death is also a technique that Ridley's used. ChozoBoy (Talk/Contribs) 23:49, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Ridley at the end of Other M
At the end of Other M, after going back to re-explore, if you go to where his corpse was, it is no longer there. that should be in the article. something like: "when samus goes back to the bottle ship, she also notices ridley's corpse is gone" or something like that. (yeah, it sounds awful, but I know somebody else will have a better version)--SGP 01:36, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

The GF's stench is all over this one to be sure.....two words .....Metroid......Fusion.Marx Wraith 03:04, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Intelligence
Would you stop going around implying anyone who disagrees with you is a moron? There is nothing "derp derp" about assuming they did something well within the bounds of scifi. It's been hinted that Ridley may have been cloned before like this by the various times his body flat-out disintegrated, and he CLEARLY has a specific vendetta against Samus, ignoring the 07th Platoon and staring her down roaring at her while she was clearly under duress, while he just instantly attacked/killed anyone else he fought. And she specifically refers to him as her long-standing nemesis. It just wouldn't have the same impact if he had a new brain. The fact is, Ridley's been killed and revived before, and he obviously kept his memories. There's absolutely no evidence besides "science says so" that it isn't the case here, and Metroid defies science all the damn time. We already said maybe, so there's no reason to remove it. If we flatout said "he remembers Samus and thus attacks her" you'd have a point. What we're doing is presenting both sides of the argument and letting the reader decide.

Tl;dr: Stop forcing your opinions on the article. Present both sides evenly, which is what we were doing until you inserted yourself in as appointed guardian of magical fictional cloning science. Dazuro 02:59, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm not calling you an idiot. I just don't think Ridley has dabbled in the dark arts of magic. Extraxi 03:06, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Wait, you think cloning is fictional?

When did I say that? I said the Feds have access to scifi technology on top of their cloning. They upload deceased military personnel to computers and remake them as AI, after all. And wouldn't a real clone require a parent? They produced him out of thin air, so clearly their cloning > ours, unless they have a few spare Ridlettas hanging around. Dazuro 03:13, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * That has an astounding amount of nothing to do with cloning.


 * And no, they wouldn't, not when you can grow a uterus independant of a body (which, by the way, is around where we're up to in cloning). Would you prefer it if I didn't condescend and explained exactly how memories work? Extraxi 03:17, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * .....No clue just no darn clue it DOES seem strange for Ridley to immediately have the gumption to tackle Samus to the ground and ignore everybody else if he didn't remember her. Oh and I honestly think Ridley has been cloned only in this game to be honest for a few simple facts;
 * One: In Metroid Prime it is stated that he survived the first battle with Samus at;eats long enough to be equipped with a half-cyborg body,therefore the battle at the end of the game would really only be the second battle samus ever fought with him.
 * Two; It is quite obvious he survived falling into the crater at the end of the battle but due to his wounds he would not make a comeback until Metroid Prime 3.
 * Three: He is NOT listed as being killed in leviathan battle
 * Four: Samus states herself that he was finished for good in Super Metroid and I'm pretty sure that Samus is sure of this as a fact considering his tenacity to always come back. Therefore after Super Metroid he could only come back as a clone because he Died for good on Zebes.Marx Wraith 03:26, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Four: Samus states herself that he was finished for good in Super Metroid and I'm pretty sure that Samus is sure of this as a fact considering his tenacity to always come back. Therefore after Super Metroid he could only come back as a clone because he Died for good on Zebes.Marx Wraith 03:26, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * I believe Max Wraith has won the internet here. I originally thought he was just cloned after MP3, but I suppose he survived also, perhaps the Phazon disappearing cause him to revert to his original self? Who knows. Either way, so if this was the first time he was cloned, I believe people who say there's a supernatural element to this. If one is clone to a baby, one is supposed to not have memories, unless this was more than just simple cloning. I'm not gonna put assumptions here, but hatred is a strong factor for death to avoid and the hatred between him and Samus is bigger than life, so why should it be bound by mortality? --66.50.175.139 03:35, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * It was definitely basic cloning, since they didn't even know it was Ridley. Even if they did, I don't think they'd want him to remember who he used to be. But the whole attacking Samus thing is just like the SA-X. It perceived a greater threat, and attacked the Omega Metroid. Which is why it only implies intelligence and cunning, not memory. Extraxi 04:44, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

I'd like to point out that supernatural elements are no strangers to Metroid. Covens, Phantoon, Chozo Ghosts, Luminoth, Brryonians -- magic and reincarnation and spells and telepathy... It's not remotely unbelievable for Ridley to retain his memories. Dazuro 05:56, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

My point exactly, though I suppose in the end that's just maybe an advanced form of science, who knows. That's why I respectively disagree with you Ex, in my opinion Ridley's showboating in this game was too personal with Samus for him to have a blank state in mind when he was cloned. 66.50.175.139 06:01, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Uh... Everything you said but reincarnation, magic, and spells don't ever happen in Metroid. The rest is not remotely related to magic. So unless you show proof he actually remembers Samus, and not that he's just a smart hunter (which is the only proof given that he remembers Samus which is already debunked, as well as him torturing Samus because he was already sadistic), then it should stay how it is. Extraxi 06:09, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

I don't think the cloned Ridley actually remembers Samus. A cloned Baby Infant Metroid tried to ATTACK her, yet the original Baby was INHOSTILE. Unless the Fed's tampering made their minds mushy then... Shadowblade777 06:12, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'd like to add to Shadow's point (because he made me realize this), that if the cloning method brought back memories (through its magic missile powers even though the GF had no actual memory data to implant), then the uprising would have happened long before Ridley was even cloned, as the Zebesians would be like 'What? You want us to be your weapons? No. We're going to kill you now. Have a nice day.' Extraxi 06:15, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Like I said, I believe Ridley's hate for Samus extends far beyond life itself. Also the way you describe the metaphysical and supernatural, Ex, is not what we're talking about here. I personally believe Ridley remembers Samus --66.50.175.139 06:24, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Look, the fact is, we do not know 100% whether he remembers or if he's just a smart hunter. Both sides have their supporters. You can't just go around undoing any edit that disagrees with your personal theory. We don't know which it is for sure, so we have to present both possibilities. Get over your ego trip. Also, as far as the infant goes, even the original infant didn't recognize Samus at first. It attacked her until she was nearly dead. Dazuro 06:25, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Let me put it this way... On Wikipedia, under Evolution, do people allow theories involving magic to be posted? Or how about under cloning, do people post things like 'but clones, through sheer force of will, remember things that never happened in their lives, but in the people they're cloned of life (using magic missile)'? Same applies here; logic before magic. Extraxi 06:35, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Nay, Ridley doesn't remember Samus. What he did was all instincts. Clone Ridley doesn't have his original memories, but he has his instincts for sure and they're telling him to kill Samus or anyone who gets in his way. Dr.Pancake 06:31, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

This is a fucking scifi game, Extraxi. And this is not Wikipedia. And if there were legitimately theories of magically-inspired evolution, they would be covered in a subsection. Dazuro 06:42, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, good, you now think it's scifi instead of Dungeons and Dragons. Perfect. I guess we're all done with this silly puff the magic dragon argument. Extraxi 06:44, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

What the hell are you even talking about? This series has always had magical elements in it. Dazuro 06:47, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * wat Extraxi 06:51, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

I just don't get why you're so opposed to showing a balanced view of both sides of an argument where clearly both sides have their supporters. Why do we have to follow you? Can you just fucking let us give fair and equal treatment to both arguments? Science doesn't matter in a scifi/fantasy game. Your argument has no more credence than ours does. None whatsoever. Dazuro 06:54, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Again. There is no argument without evidence. I have evidence, and I know something about predatorial behaviors, where it has become evident that you do not. Why are you so opposed to giving us evidence that he does remember her? Why do we have to have theories without any evidence? Extraxi 06:57, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

You have no evidence besides "real-life science says so," and real-life science has no bearing here. Our evidence is actually drawn from the game cutscenes. Either way, there's no real in-game conclusive evidence either way. I'm sure eventually Nintendo will come out and say one or the other, but as of right now, there is absolutely 100% no conclusive evidence in the game toward your theory or ours. So either put them both, or mention nothing about it at all. That is how we do it here. Dazuro 07:01, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh wow. You just proved why NOT to post the other puff the magic dragon theory while calling evidence for predatorial behavior to be magic remembering. Good show. If you want to whine more about it in IRC, I'm done here. I wouldn't want you embaressing yourself anymore. Extraxi 07:07, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Would you grow the fuck up and knock off the insults already? It certainly doesn't help your point. We don't CARE what real-life theories and biology say. This is a wiki for a videogame. We go by what the games tell us. Samus contradicts the law of conservation of mass all the time and we just accept that. Your evidence is completely irrelevant here. According to in-game material, it's possible that he remembers her. It's also possible he does not. We either SAY both are possible, or we say nothing at all about it. Dazuro 07:11, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Your 'according to in-game material' demonstrates predatorial instincts first, and 'remembers samus' later, by the way. Unless you get evidence that explicitly points out that Ridley has somehow retained memories, then it's predator first, crackpot second.


 * Oh, and conservation of mass isn't cloning. You never gave evidence of 'magic throughout metroid' still, and you STILL haven't given evidence of Ridley remembering Samus. Are you really just arguing that if you can't have your way, no one can have any way? Extraxi 07:40, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Magic: Luminoth. Covens. Mother Brain. Phantoon. Chozo Ghosts. Reptilicus. Evidence of remembrance: What's the point? I'm sure you have another scientific predation theory drawn from external sources that don't fucking matter in Metroid'. When did I say anything to the effect of your last sentence? "Tantrum"? Seriously? What the hell is the matter with you? I'm trying to make sure BOTH sides get their way, and apparently that means I'm throwing a tantrum and not letting you have your way? Boo hoo, you don't get to force your opinion on us. Get over it. We provide both sides and let the readers decide, or we provide neither side at all. That is how this wiki works. If you don't like it, you're more than welcome to stop editing. Pretending like my evidence is invalid does not mean I gave no evidence. I don't know why you have such a problem with letting other people have their opinions, but I suggest you stop before an admin makes you stop. I've had the same problem for a long time. Dazuro 08:04, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Lol... Your list of magic curiously lacks magic. Just ghosts and telekenisis, both of which aren't directly related to magic... Interesting. I believe you are confusing yourself, and now trying to prove that there is no magic in Metroid, although you are the one arguing it...


 * But I digress. I think your behavior has been deplorable. You have no excuse for personally attacking other editors, even if you think they are in the wrong. You are required to explain your reasoning if asked to, which you have yet to do. You have given no evidence of how Ridley remembers Samus. Keep that in mind. Extraxi 08:13, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

The Bryyonians are explicitly said to use magic. And you've been attacking me a hell of a lot more reliably. And actually, I reverted an edit. Therefore, the burden of proof is on you, as the one who initiated the edit. And all of the evidence you've submitted thus far is real-life science, unrelated to Metroid. I did in fact give reason to believe Ridley remembers Samus, but again, you conveniently ignore that. Ignorance of evidence is not absence of evidence. Keep THAT in mind. Deplorable behavior indeed. At least I'm following protocol instead of forcing my opinion on other people. I'm trying to keep things open-minded and open-ended. You're being fascist and twisting facts and words. Which is truly more deplorable? Dazuro 08:17, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey, you said something that does use magic! I didn't read the rest, though... I'm hoping your next post will have evidence of the other thing you're arguing now. Like, at the beginning. Extraxi 08:24, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Are you going out of your way to be as difficult and infuriating to deal with as possible? I gave you your goddamned evidence several posts ago. Ignoring them does not make them go away. Or did you doctor another talkpage to get rid of what I said and change my wording? I wouldn't put it past you at this rate. Dazuro 08:25, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Wait, no... Says you never see Bryyonians perform magic... Could just be plain alchemy like the zombie powder around in Africa... Oh well. Got my hopes all up and about for nothing... Extraxi 08:28, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Italics caught my eye! Wait, do you mean the evidence that was debunked as possibly memories before you even brought them up a while back? Extraxi 08:29, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Nothing was debunked. Whatever. You clearly have no interest in actually doing anything productive besides enforcing your One True Opinion onto Ridley's page, and I have better things to do than throw evidence at a brick wall. Come tomorrow when more editors are online, we can correct Ridley's page as per policy, and go about our merry days. Psst, weren't you going to leave this issue be a while ago? Couldn't resist the urge to argue more, could you? Figures. Dazuro 08:30, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * You mean the debunked thing isn't debunked even though it's debunked and currently debunked by being debunked in a debunking manner yet is still somehow debunked? O: Extraxi 08:36, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Grow up. Dazuro 08:36, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm still waiting for you to. Why do you think I stopped arguing? Extraxi 08:40, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Look at the bright side, guy. Once you explain why the Zebesians didn't remember anything, but Ridley did, this Ridley has memories theory will have some credability. Extraxi 08:51, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * I feel like, that this "fight" was made for me :D Okay, Ridley IMO doesn't have his memories in Other M because, he would have killed her right away ... plus, Clones can't just get their memories back right away :P plus, evidence in the metroid series shows having to implant memories, not gain them by itself. Metroid101 11:49, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

I think the lot of you need to read WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA before you both get blocked. As for my opinion on the matter, it's simply this: Magic is often the explanation for events that cannot otherwise be explained, historically due to lack of understanding for what was actually involved. This does not of course mean that said events were caused by magic; it just makes a convenient explanation. -- FastLizard4 {ADMIN} (Talk&bull;Contribs&bull;Logs) - Would you like to participate in the new forum trials? 12:45, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

I've been trying, but look at this! He's being ridiculously difficult. All I'm trying to do is keep things open-ended instead of forcing one person's opinion as the only one we represent. In any case, I'd also like to point out something I just realized--do we even know for sure 100% he was cloned? Ridley's been seen to regenerate himself from near-destruction before by eating things. We assumed that meant that a near-dead dragon-Ridley crawled around eating corpses, but that was never confirmed. Isn't it possible that his cells recreated themselves autonomously? Which just brings up another point, even if he was cloned, his cell structure is obviously unique in that he CAN do that, so his clone might not be treated the same as a metroid's. But either way, Extraxi, I would also like to point out this: the games never actually say that Metroid Prime and Dark Samus share an intellect. I've fought long and hard to keep theories based on that out. But despite that, we still have representation on the trivia sections of that theory, saying things like "Dark Samus may have released metroids because she was once a metroid." It's a bit annoying, but I came to terms with it. You need to bite the bullet here and do the same. Dazuro

Ok let us put it this way,maybe Ridley just likes SHINY stuff like any bird would. lol Marx Wraith 20:30, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

The part that bothers everyone seems to be the one where Adolescent Ridley tackles Samus, so what if he was just as ready to do the same to the GF troops, but Samus got in the way. I found it odd that they would just stop fighting just so they can "wait" for Samus to appear. Dr.Pancake 20:41, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Daz, Daz, Daz... I'm not being difficult. I've laid out detailed explanations as to how and why Ridley doesn't and can't remember Samus, involving general data storage of memories and the inconsistencies that would ultimately fill the game with plotholes if he did remember her, but no one else remembered anything. Yet you keep saying 'No that evidence is magic!' So I'll ask you again (since I already had fun with the trolling thing), go on and give evidence as to why:


 * the Zebesians don't remember anything, but Ridley does


 * how the Galactic Federation implanted Ridley's memories into Ridley if they did not have his memories or knew he was Ridley


 * ing magnets, how do they work?


 * the aforementioned evidence is instead displays of memory, instead of just predatorial prowess
 * Go on. Even make a fancy new section for it. I did for mine. It's very fancy. I welcome your evidence towards these three (four?) things, instead of saying 'no my theory should be up too because miracles.'


 * Wait, wait, hold on. We're all 100% sure he was cloned because they admit they accidentally cloned him since they were just playing Genetic Pinata with the gunk on Samus' armor, but now you're not sure? Okay. Uh... Alright. I can ignore this. Just.. Sigh. Extraxi 21:06, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh God, I should've read your entire post. "Treated just like a Metroid" when they say Little Birdie was treated like a pet? Dude, stop trolling before you get yourself suspended. Extraxi 21:09, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

How do you know the Zebesians don't remember anything? They never talk. And the Feds don't have to implant memories; as I said, he's demonstrated the ability to rebuild himself and keep his memories intact. And as far as I know, they never said they cloned him, only that they didn't realize the creature was Ridley and that it had no potential as a bioweapon. And I'm hardly the one trolling. I'm just pissed that you won't allow us to show any opinions that disagree with your own. Knock it off. Dazuro 21:58, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Look, either quit trolling and get serious or just stop. You know if the Zebesians remembered anything, there would be an uprising long before MB went crazy. You know there is never any evidence that he somehow has the ability to regain memories he never had. And as far as you know, they did clone them. You're just trying to agitate an argument for nothing, made obvious because you've yet to lay out any evidence for any of these. Enough of your trolling, man. Extraxi 22:03, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Would you seriously shut the hell up about this trolling bullshit already? I am not the one mocking you ceaselessly and provoking arguments and ignoring evidence. You're being a textbook troll right now, and projecting it onto me is NOT helping your case. Dazuro 22:09, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm being a troll? Here, let me show you something I said earlier.


 * Daz, Daz, Daz... I'm not being difficult. I've laid out detailed explanations as to how and why Ridley doesn't and can't remember Samus, involving general data storage of memories and the inconsistencies that would ultimately fill the game with plotholes if he did remember her, but no one else remembered anything. Yet you keep saying 'No that evidence is magic!' So I'll ask you again (since I already had fun with the trolling thing), go on and give evidence as to why:


 * the Zebesians don't remember anything, but Ridley does


 * how the Galactic Federation implanted Ridley's memories into Ridley if they did not have his memories or knew he was Ridley


 * ing magnets, how do they work?


 * the aforementioned evidence is instead displays of memory, instead of just predatorial prowess
 * Go on. Even make a fancy new section for it. I did for mine. It's very fancy. I welcome your evidence towards these three (four?) things, instead of saying 'no my theory should be up too because miracles.'
 * And no one has seen anything laid out yet, I'm sure. You've been given plenty of chances to simply write out all of your evidence in a clear, and concise manner instead of just saying 'no put my theory up.' In fact, you can't run out of chances until you get suspended for trolling. You could have laid out a full diagram by now of all the evidence you "have" but instead argue nothing with nothing! So I'm done. No more feeding Daz the Troll. I have a full explanation as to why he doesn't remember, and you don't. Trying to magic your theory in would count as vandalism, troll. Extraxi 22:18, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * (message somehow got deleted) i have to agree with extraxi here. i suggest daz scroll up and see what he wrote out. i believe he wants you to do something like this, since what your saying doesnt seem to have structure, and it doesnt seem to tackle anything like inconsistencies 68.169.40.21 00:31, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * (message somehow got deleted) i have to agree with extraxi here. i suggest daz scroll up and see what he wrote out. i believe he wants you to do something like this, since what your saying doesnt seem to have structure, and it doesnt seem to tackle anything like inconsistencies 68.169.40.21 00:31, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * (message somehow got deleted) i have to agree with extraxi here. i suggest daz scroll up and see what he wrote out. i believe he wants you to do something like this, since what your saying doesnt seem to have structure, and it doesnt seem to tackle anything like inconsistencies 68.169.40.21 00:31, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Magic
I simply want to specify the existance of magic in Metroid CLEARLY (since Extraxi seemingly ignores it): the last few Mogenars built by the last Science Lord is made of both Magic/dark arts and technology (something along those lines, see the log book on Bryyo history). The boss you face in leviathan on Bryyo is one of these special Mogenars, and it DOES perform magical powers, such as making extended hands surrounded by floating runic symbols. Other things mentioned in Bryyo history is the old tribes using their magic during the war against the technology used by the science lords. And just the presence of Ghosts within the Metroid series, especially how the Chozo ghosts lived within their respective temple artifacts in Metroid Prime 1, ultimately proves the existance of supernatural/magical elements in Metroid. I, for one, back the possibility of Ridley having memories of Samus. A mention of this in the article DOES NOT HURT ANYONE, just as how the Metroid Prime creature article mentions ALL possible explanations behind its origins. (24.201.170.219 22:23, September 7, 2010 (UTC)).


 * To be fair, I haven't been ignoring it. (I never played Prime 3.) Some troll kept trying to say there was magic without giving direct reference to something specifically consisting of magic in any Metroid game to prove there WAS magic, but then you came along. But supernatural and magic still aren't connected. Extraxi 22:27, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Disagreeing with you does not make me a troll. Get over your goddamned ego already. And what the hell are you talking about? Magic is supernatural. As are ghosts. It's all in the same boat. Dazuro 22:30, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Youre just splitting hairs Extraxi, they both dwell in the supernatural. (24.201.170.219 22:34, September 7, 2010 (UTC))

Yes, but if he admitted that he'd have to stop calling me a troll/vandal for five seconds, and that's clearly too much to ask from him. Dazuro 22:37, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Quit trolling, Daz, and whine about how you haven't given out any evidence for your theory in the other section. This is a discussion of magic in the Magic section, as you can see. Once you get some evidence, you can put it there, not here (unless you think Ridley's magical now).


 * Anyway, back to the discussion at hand. I still believe they're seperate, either way. No real way to prove they're connected, and I feel like this would devolve into 'no the first Ghostbusters was better.' So... Do these Mogenars demonstrate magic of some kind in front of the player, or is it just stated in the scan? Extraxi 22:41, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * The Mogenar boss is essentially made out of stone instead of machinery like the other Mogenars seen elsewhere on Bryyo; this already starts suggesting the creature is magical. Like i mentioned before, this boss performs magic in the form of an attack which he creates see-through hands that extend from his and are surrounded by floating runic symbols resembling encantations. The inhabitants of Bryyo, such as Reptilicus, are seemingly able to form whips out of thin air, and may be part of their magical traditions, but it cant be said for sure for this particular attack. The last lord of science met, if im not mistaken, a witch that could see into the future, just as how Chozo were able to. I would also like to drawn your attention to Thardus, a boss from Metroid Prime made out of stone; though it was given life with Phazon, it still is nonetheless a supernatural creature. Dark Samus herself seems to create ghostlike copies of herself within each Bounty Hunter in Prime 3. All of these are supernatural elements.
 * One last thing i'd like to add, if you take a look at the Metroid Prime creature's article, the page mentions all possible theories behind its creation, whether they have plotholes or not. If that article can have that, then i dont see why cant the Ridley article mention the possibility of it retaining memories of Samus in Other M. (24.201.170.219 22:57, September 7, 2010 (UTC))
 * If Ridley can keep his memory at even a genetic level then he truly is a freak abomination of nature. That's saying something considering he would already be the very definition of a freak of nature for all the times he's cheated death. Heck, the X probably wasn't even the end of him for all we know! Marx Wraith 04:48, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * well, the x are said to absorb memories... come to think of it, the scientist guy with the wide beam in fusion could have been trying to destroy the station along with himself, and wasn't aware he was an x copy until he had to defend himself or something. except ridley-x would only remember the time on the bottle ship... 68.169.40.21 04:55, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * well, the x are said to absorb memories... come to think of it, the scientist guy with the wide beam in fusion could have been trying to destroy the station along with himself, and wasn't aware he was an x copy until he had to defend himself or something. except ridley-x would only remember the time on the bottle ship... 68.169.40.21 04:55, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

That could actually be an interesting plot twist IMO, if he didn't retain his memories. The X absorb the pirates and Ridley so they can have their intellect and power, but these versions are separated from the "hive" and are completely feral... and they end up just getting some mindless beasts. I can just picture the Dr. Claw-esque "CUUUURSES!" as the X realize they got a useless Ridley. <_< Dazuro 04:59, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Let's Do The Time Warp Again
Why is it so hard for you to remain civil? Is it really so much to ask that you not insult and mock me with every post you make? God, you are infuriating. In any case. They conjure magical glowing green hands out of their physical hands and send them around to telephatically pick things up and attack. That magical enough for you? Beyond that the Bryyonians themselves were divided into the Lords of Science and the Lords of Magic, the implications of which should be clear enough. Dazuro 22:43, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm being civil. I'm sitting here, discussing magic with Numbers, yet you want to drag me back into your argument, in which I still wait for your evidence. Until then, I'll keep only reading the first line of each post, waiting for "Here, I have finally compiled the evidence." Extraxi 22:50, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Selective reading. A hallmark of a master troll. Also, stop reverting my edits. We wouldn't want to violate 3RR, now, would we? And again, stop calling me a troll/vandal just because I disagree with your opinion. That is not civility. Dazuro 22:52, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm undoing trolling and vandalism, because you are making edits with no supporting evidence. I've told you many times to lay out your evidence, but the fact you've yet to proves that you are a troll. Now keep it clean and civil, and finally do it if you're not a troll. (If this message is not followed by laid out evidence of memories as well as working around inconsistencies, it will be direct proof that you are a troll.) Extraxi 22:56, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Grrr. People, people, PLEASE, let's stop acting like two-year olds and discuss this rationally for a moment! I know that although Daruzo and Extraxi both sometimes comes off as a little blunt, in my experiance both are serious and contributing members of the community and not a troll. Both of you (all three of you?) need to step back for a moment and close off a few intellectual rabbit holes you've wandered down. I don't know if there are supernatural elements in Metroid, and at the moment I don't care because it is irrelevant to this discussion. Ridley may or may not remember who he was- the events of the game are far too ambiguous to say for sure. But it is scientifically possible, and I'll show you how:


 * You're all assuming that Ridley forms memories in the same way Humans and other terrestrial life forms do, by means of proteins stored in the hippocampus region of the brain. But what if his memories are actually stored in his DNA? It is an information-carrying medium, after all... cells produce new DNA every time they divide, and I see no theoretical reason why they couldn't add on encoded memories while doing so, then read them off later. Sure, it wouldn't replace the regular way of doing it, because DNA splitting and transcription is far too slow to let you access, say, where you parked your car, but if Ridley's nerve cells somehow transferred long-term memories and knowledge to some sort of '"messenger" cells that transcribed them into DNA and carried that DNA to cells throughout his body to be included in their copy of his genome, and could then pull those memories out of the DNA at a later date and return them to the brain's conventional storage system, it couldvery well work. It's a complex process, but so are cellular respiration, thought, vision, and all the hundreds of other things that organic life does on a dialy basis. Now, that ability could either have been genetically engineered into Ridley, or it could have evolved naturally in his species, because being able to pass down experiance and knowledge directly from parent(s?) to child would represent a huge survival advantage. If the GF got ahold of Ridley's DNA and cloned him, that clone would then be able to unpack the stored memories and then re-integrate them into its own brain, without resorting to supernatural means that may or may not be presant in the games.


 * Thus, he either could or couldn't have his memories intact, depending on the evidence in the game, which in my interperetation is completely ambiguous. So let's all try to calm down and get to some sort of agreement in a civil manner.... otherwise articles are going to start getting locked down, and people are going to start getting privelages revoked.--AdmiralSakai 00:08, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * id question how you see daz as a serious contributor when youre the one who just established the possibility of ridley having memories, even though he seemed to be arguing it for a while now. besides that, it is pretty interesting. it could be the scientists also used a method of cloning that increased the aging process, so that might mean he can remember faster. i don't know much about advanced aging, though 68.169.40.21 00:24, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Very true. I'd also like to point out that in the Star Wars Expanded Universe, the Emperor has multiple clones of his own body and is capable of transferring his essence into the spare bodies after he dies. Yes, that's Star Wars and not Metroid, but they're both scifi universes. The point is, there's precedent for it in star-borne villains. Yes, Star Wars has the Force, but Metroid has telepathy/magic/psychic powers/etc. No reason it can't be the same way. Dazuro 00:13, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Anonymous, I am basing my statement on Daruzo's activity on a wide assortment of other articles I have also contributed to, not specifically on this page, where everybody seems rather irrational. Also, please endeavor to put your statements at the bottom of the page- sections in talk pages are supposed to read in chronological order from top to bottom.--AdmiralSakai 00:33, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

understandable, also, sorry, i mean to reply to you directly 68.169.40.21 00:35, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

We all ought to really stop making up things, and especially must stop adding extraneous things. Let's get this simplified. As far as the Metroid series goes, there is only one Ridley. Next, Ridley was killed and left on planet Zebes along with Mother Brain and the Space Pirates. Samus brings this up. That's why when she sees Ridley, she says, "Ridley?!" The Space Pirates can get away with this because they're collective. Ridley isn't.

Next, Little Birdie is the first form of Ridley. If Ridley is not truly dead, then we have two Ridleys. The first one is Ridley, who is not dead. The second one is Little Birdie, who is metamorphisizing into another Ridley.

As for magic and the supernatural, that's in the Metroid series, but if you pay close attention, this kind of thing is far more prevalent in the Metroid Prime Trilogy. In the original five, you see ghosts and know of telepathic abilities, but not any magic. Remember, Sakamoto was not involved with MPT. For all we know, he's ignoring the trilogy.

The idea of memories being implanted into Ridley's mind is not worth noting because someone, somewhere, would have to have know that Little Birdie was going to become Ridley. And, as it has been said before, clones do not have memories of the true self. Take twins for example. One of them is a natural clone of the other. Being an identical twin myself, if I have a friend my brother has never met, he is not going to know of my friend. Better yet, assume I hate someone my brother does not know about, and my brother befriends this person when he learns of him, our way of perceiving this person is different. Metroid Fan 01:09, September 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * i think it's safe to assume the first ridley exploded with zebes, because itd be impossible to fly off after exploding, and cant really regenerate from being spacedust. the missing ridley at the end of other m explains how he got onto the bsl station. 68.169.40.21 01:30, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Again, there's no need for anyone to have known that Little Birdie would become Ridley. As Sakai stated above, we don't know that Ridley's species is neurologically the same as our creatures. As I mentioned earlier, he apparently has some sort of genetic memory to an extent as he resurrected from near-death at least once before. We do not know whether he resurrected as a fully-fledged dragon, or if this game was their way of showing his eat-to-revive feature firsthand, i.e. there was a Little Birdie running around K-2L until he revived himself. It sounds like wild speculation and I'd agree did his ingame actions not indicate that he does indeed have something against Samus--and when it's a creature with a known ability to stay sentient after apparent death, it's hardly out of the question. We mention the theory that the Berserker Lords are both the same creature. We mention the theory that Dark Samus still remembers being a metroid. Neither of these are explicitly stated ingame, but are merely implied by their actions, appearance, et cetera. This is no different.

I don't want to fill the page with crazy theories. But answer me this: do we know with 100% certainty that he does not remember her? No. Hell no. Maybe it's more likely, but we don't know for sure. As the page stands, it says with no ambiguity that he does not remember her. That can't stand. It has to either say he "may" remember her, or leave the sentence out entirely. There is no other alternative, save Sakamoto himself answering the question. Dazuro 03:23, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

i dont think being cloned counts as regenerating from near-death. i also think it's just a bit unusual anyone in the galactic federation would fly down to zebes while it's blowing up and pick up the rotting corpse of ridley without realizing it suddenly turned into a little bird-thing in its hands... 68.169.40.21 04:49, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, you must not have the game because it is stated about half-way through that Ridley like all the creatures from Zebes,were cloned from the DNA particles they left on her suit when she killed them. Therefore Ridley started out as a baby like all the creatures they cloned,hence him being little birdie without the scientists realizing what he really was.Marx Wraith 04:55, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

i believe extraxi had mentioned that earlier. maybe daz doesn't believe the scientists? 68.169.40.21 05:01, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

They never say Ridley was explicitly cloned. And if he was, why was he still a baby when everything else on the station save the Zeros reached adulthood? Dazuro 05:03, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

they do, and because they treated him as a pet and not as a weapon and didn't try to accelerate his age, probably. or he needed meat to molt. either works. 68.169.40.21 05:08, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

And would you really experiment on your pet man! X( Marx Wraith 05:10, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

When do they say he was cloned? The game never actually says that. It's somewhat implied, but never actually said. Give me the quote and I'll gladly concede. Dazuro 05:12, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Meh,something MB said .....would have to check the cutscene for a reminder......but my Wii is sitting in the living room.....I'm sick in bed......and its 1:15 in Ohio....... Marx Wraith 05:15, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

daz, maybe you should just get other m and play through it... 68.169.40.21 05:22, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Dah? He doesn't even have it,then why in the world would he make such a strong argument about Ridley not being cloned if he doesn't even know ?_?

Where the hell is this idea that I don't have the game coming from? As far as I know I'm the first Metroid Wiki user that got it. I played it before it came out on a review copy FFS, and I've run through the game two more times since release. That doesn't change the fact that MB never actually says he was cloned. She just said they didn't realize that it was Ridley. Dazuro 05:34, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

...Not a clue,but even samus states Ridley died with Zebes and there was never a second Ridley. I think if I am not mistaken the Metroid Queen in the game GREW from a larval metroid,the same one MB became attached to,so how can there be much doubt? Marx Wraith 05:38, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

well if you do have it, maybe you should finish it if you haven't? 68.169.40.21 05:43, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

... I just said I've beaten it three times. Comprehension issues, much? As for what Marx says... 'scuse me? I fail to see how the Queen Metroid is relevant at all here. And as far as Ridley dying, yes, as far as she knew Ridley died. But he was thought to have died on K-2L as well, and he regenerated himself. This sequence was never seen. His regeneration might manifest itself as his remaining cells starting as Little Birdie and gradually growing back up into a proper Ridley. This game takes a lot of things from the manga like that, and it seems to me that if they were going to say he can regenerate by eating things, and then in the next game he eats things to build himself a new body... there just might be a connection there. Dazuro 05:45, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

... huh... well... fourth time's the charm?

also, in my one playthrough, i don't believe anyone makes any mention of a little bird jumping out of the jar of gunk they scraped off samus' armor... 68.169.40.21 05:49, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Ok then Ridley just showed up at a Space Staion millions of miles away from Zebes,somehow managed with his immense size to stow away onboard without being noticed,then decided to reverse his age and become a "pet" to the science team to get a free meal.....yep,makes WAY more sense. -_- Marx Wraith 05:53, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

I just have to say, I'm fighting Mystery Creature as we speak, and that cutscene... I mean, seriously, just watch it again. Ridley is running away. He's just climbing a building getting away from the troops. He either is afraid of them and running away, or isn't interested in mindless killing at the moment. But as soon as Samus shows up, he jumps back in the fray, either because his hatred of her surpasses his fear, or because the kill would no longer be "for the sake of killing." Look at his face--he pauses and just eyes her briefly for a second. He immediately recognizes her and leaps straight on top of her, right as his minions show up to distract the troopers so he can fight her one-on-one. Why would he do any of that if it was just a "predatory instinct" as that other guy said? And I never said he randomly flew to the Bottle Ship and reversed his age. What the hell are you talking about? His cells survived on Samus and he resurrected himself. Or he was cloned but somehow retained his memory due to his unique cell structure retaining his memories for the sake of his resurrection abilities. Or MB did it. Hell, I don't know. But he knows that's Samus. Watch the scene again and you'll see. Dazuro 05:56, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

you're overanalyzing and getting flustered over this and confusing up everything, and already started up some personal attack on me for no reason. please, keep this civil.

also, you mean the time ridley set a trap for what he saw as the largest threat. 68.169.40.21 06:00, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

.. Personal attacks? What the heck are you talking about? And there's no reason that the "largest threat" theory should have credence over the "he remembers the woman that killed him last time" theory. It's scifientifically sound, and it makes a lot more sense. But again, I'm not saying we need to write HE REMEMBERS HER. No, I believe both theories need representation, because both have their evidence and both have plenty of supporters. Why can't we just be fair? Why do people keep coming in here and trying to shoehorn their theory in over everyone else's? They're both equally plausible, by the facts given in the game. Dazuro 06:02, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Yes I know the scene too,he DEFINFITELY looked like he recognized her, it was revenge time baby! Ridley is so freaking amazing clone or not he'd never forget the face of his biggest regret in life! Marx Wraith 06:03, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

But again, let me emphasize--I am not here to debate which theory is more plausible. I don't know. None of us do. The best course of action is to leave it off the page entirely, because we do not know the facts. We can't cite it by any means. It's a 50-50 crapshoot at best, one way or the other. So let's just leave things ambiguous and let the reader decide. That's our duty as an encyclopedia. To either provide all the facts, or provide several viable theories. Dazuro 06:05, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

"Comprehension issues, much?" you really should read the rules. i don't think you want to bring admins back into this.

also, because clones don't tend to remember things that never happened to them, but their originals. i mean, you only started with the genetic memory thing when admiral said it... but now you think he wasn't even cloned, and somehow came out of nowhere and the scientists, who are scientists, just started treating it like their pet? really.... 68.169.40.21 06:13, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

I said I'd beaten it twice. You told me I should beat the game before playing it. I somewhat jokingly suggested that you had comprehension issues there. It's not an attack; don't be so sensitive. And again, regardless of what real science says, this is not real life. It's plausible within the realm of Metroid, a lot of people believe it, and the game does somewhat support it. It's unjust to remove it just because you or Extrati or anyone else doesn't agree with it. Until we get official Word of God on the subject, all we can do is offer both theories or no theory at all. End of story.

As far as my alleged conspiracies, I don't know what I believe, I'm not debating my personal theory, I'm just pointing out that there are alternatives. Devil's advocate and such. I can see how that was confusing though. Dazuro 06:16, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

hm... you said three before, now it's two... and i said to beat the game before coming up with theories... something's not being very consistent here... i don't think you sincerely mean that it wasn't an attack at all, just because i disagree with you. in fact, it's just because you disagree with extraxi that you fought with him instead of detailing your theory before admiral said anything, and tried to get rid of what seems more sound versus.. ridley hopping out of a jar of goo while the scientists thought nothing of it... 68.169.40.21 06:24, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

I'm in the middle of my third run. Hence why I'm fighting Juvenile Ridley. But thanks for the implied attacks of your own there, they're definitely helping matters. I fought with Extraxi not because I disagree with his theory, but because he refused to allow any theory but his own to go on the page. And once Admiral spoke up, I realized that it made sense and acknowledged it as a possibility as well. And I never said Ridley hopped out of a jar. Stop oversimplifying my arguments. What is this, National go-out-of-your-way-to-irritate-Daz Week?

Look. We finally got the situation out of control. It took an admin to stop the fight last time. Will you just lay off and let us treat the theories fairly already? Stop escalating things. We do NOT need this. Dazuro 06:27, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

he didn't let any theory but his own..? then why did he keep telling you to put out evidence behind the theory you were fighting for? that doesn't make sense... why didn't you put out any evidence everytime he asked, anyway?

how about you explain in detail how exactly ridley regenerated from nothing but smears on samus' armor, and why scientists would suddenly treat something like that as a pet? 68.169.40.21 06:34, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

I did put forth evidence, which he conveniently ignored/pretended didn't exist/discounted with information from outside the Metroid series. But what the hell does all this matter? The page is locked, only admins can edit it, and obviously none of them are around at the moment. We're not accomplishing anything right now. In the interest of not getting the talkpage locked again, let's just leave it be. This won't end well otherwise and you know it. Dazuro 06:37, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

no, you didn't... there was always some smart remark from you everytime he asked. you only have to scroll up to see it. but let's try this again, since you ignored/pretended didn't exist...

how about you explain in detail how exactly ridley regenerated from nothing but smears on samus' armor, and why scientists would suddenly treat something like that as a pet? 68.169.40.21 06:40, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Again, what's the point? We're only going to accomplish getting this article locked and ourselves reprimanded. We can't change the article right now. Leave it be until an admin gets back. Dazuro 06:43, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

to prove you're not just putting out theories left and right without thinking about them... you wouldn't do it with extraxi, and the page wasn't locked then. you won't do it now, either, and you have no reason not to, but you spend time arguing why you shouldn't explain why instead.... 68.169.40.21 06:48, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Actually, yes, it was, temporarily. Now lay off, you're not going to goad me into snapping again. Dazuro 06:50, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

i'm not goading you to snap. you're avoiding explaining how your theory works. but you expect it to be on the main ridley page? 68.169.40.21 06:52, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

I don't know how it happened. It happened with scifimagic or something. Who knows? The point is, he seems to remember her ingame, even if scientifically speaking he shouldn't be able to. That's something that's notable to mention on the page. Dazuro 06:56, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

sigh... don't you see, daz? you just want ridley to remember her. you want him to remember so bad that you want to come up with crazy theories in which he does remember independantly of zebesians... what you think as 'seems to remember' can be explained through predatorial behavior... i read a whole few wikipages on this after i read extraxi's detailing on how he couldn't remember, and it all comes together. the only thing that comes close would be admiral's theory, but that's incredibly farfetched, as well as brings up issues involving ridley's general reflexes as well as far too much data to be stored directly in dna without his dna being drastically different from head to toe, which would do something funny to his body...

i think you should just move on. a rock won't change its shape if you want it to really badly 68.169.40.21 07:02, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Man, this must be a really good game to warrant an argument this big. I havn't personally played it, but I asked my Biology teacher about this and he replied with a hugely complicated response about lots of this memories in genetics and stuff...

He said "...and some creatures can even store memories in their DNA, giving their CHILDREN and in some cases MAN MADE CLONES the knowledge of PLAUSIBLE PREDATORS..." This should clear up some chaff. He also said "...also, some creatures with intelligence close to man, like dolphins, can store PERSONAL MEMORIES of certain things, like favorite food sources or KNOWN NEMESIS'S..."

Now, this may clear things up. I've never played Metroid: Other M (heck, the only Metroid game I've played is Super Metroid, and I'm not even half way though it!) but I'm sick of having a respectable contributor (Dazuro) getting blasted with insults when he has a respectable argument backing him up. Benfen 11:12, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

it'd be pretty neat to get some respectable supporting details along with that 68.169.40.21 11:17, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

What do you mean? I thought that that peice of info is ENOUGH supporting evidence for us to basically say that "[the new] Ridley may have [the old] Ridley's memories as in some animal cases memories are passed down through children and clones." My Biology teacher basically hit the nail on the head. But, why not just post both theories? Its just like the three Giza Pyramids. You need to keep your mind open. Benfen 11:25, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

From you, maybe, even though it requires a better source. But I gotta agree with the other anonymous here; reading back, Daz hasn't given a single bit of credence to any of his own theories, and kept any form of supporting evidence away from them, yet argued them on for what I'm sure is at least ten pages now. I think any theory that should be posted should only be posted if it has even the slightest bit of credability. Him saying that Ridley regenerated from armor shavings in front of the scientists, who thought nothing of it and treated it as a pet, would be one such 'complete bubcus' theory. 89.145.83.41 11:42, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Please do not expect me to understand this. I have no idea what scientists you are talking about and stuff like that. I feel like I should buy the game just to resolve this issue. Daz may be trying to avoid putting evidence behind his theory, but he was partly right. After looking up Youtube videoes, Ridley's face at the time of Mysterious Creature thingy was complete HATRED. So just pretend that my info from memories through genes was put up by him, OK? And I just wanted to resolve this before Daz got emotionally scarred for life as a result of uneeded name calling (Not from you anonymouses). I thought that would clear all argument. Just put both up and stop disscussing this. Seriously, this must be a prettey good game to get arguments this bad... Benfen 11:59, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * i would like to see admiral's theory's source, actually. it's pretty interesting. especially since it's pretty much the only thing slightly supporting the whole thing about ridley remembering... i really hope it doesn't turn out to be an explanation on how instinctual behaviour works. 68.169.40.21 11:50, September 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm explaining, so it'll contain spoilers. At one point in the game, I believe Melissa Bergman remarked on how they were cloning every strand of DNA they pulled off Samus' suit. When they accidently cloned Ridley, no one knew it was Ridley. (However, Daz believes Ridley being cloned was instead some way of regenerating, evidently.) That means that's an entirely new Ridley. The only way it could remember is if Admiral's theory has any credence to it, which I'm now also hoping for a source to.

Also, at the Mystery Creature phase, I really doubt anyone could tell any facial expressions from it. All you have to go on is his cold, calculative maneuver to eliminate a primary threat. Adding 'he had memories which is why he did it' doesn't make much sense without any proof behind it, which is where I believe this entire argument had started, in which Daz continued to refuse evidence (which, if you ask me, does seem like trolling, arguing without proof, so I can't blame Extraxi for getting notably frusturated), and now we're here. 89.145.83.41 12:10, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining, 89.145. Thanks heaps. Now I understand Daz's ignorance, and feel free too incorparate spoilers, I know nothing of the modern Metroid stories. But I am still on Daz's side. Partly. I think it can remember Samus, as it may have remembered her from the DNA on the strand of hair. But I have just taken the time to read over the remarks of other people, and I noticed that Admiral's take of it is the exact same of mine. You see, I just walked up to the teacher and asked: "Can a Clone retain memories of its origonal?" So, I'm not with Daz anymore. Im with Admiral. Anyway, keep posting, but this may be my last. I'm 13 and it's 10:23 PM on a Wednesday night in Australia XD. I might post back if my parents forget to send me to bed. Benfen 12:27, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * i believe daz had also implied some magical influence towards retaining memories earlier? anyway, pulling from what ex said, i think 'natural behavioral patterns' heavily outweigh an out there idea with little supporting explanations... 68.169.40.21 12:14, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * My theory is actually just an idea I had after watching an otherwise-bad Star Trek episode with a similar premise. I've tried to nitpick it and haven't found anything that makes it impossible using my moderate knowledge of biology, but it's not actually FROM any scientific source. I'll ask around with the teachers and people at school today, see if they can help me refine/refute it.--AdmiralSakai 12:19, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * awwww... well, maybe its for the best. processing sensory data with all information stored directly into dna would be... well, im not sure. really, really confusing? 68.169.40.21 12:25, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

woah man... youre thirteen? now thats impressive. anyway, i don't know what you mean about the strand of hair thing... 68.169.40.21 13:16, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

I think he's referring to my theory about workable generic memory. The entire biology department seems to be gone today, and nobody else I talked to understood the concept very well....... and 68.169, the data in DNA would be strictly used as long-term memory for prescisely the reason you mention: using it to remember how to do day-to-day tasks would be really, really slow. For those of you who know a little about computers, the DNA would serve as a sort of hard drive and the brain would serve as RAM: you don't store everything you're doing on the drive while you're doing it, but if you want something preserved for a long time with little degradation, you take the time to write it onto the disc.--AdmiralSakai 20:11, September 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * now the only question is how much can be stored in a single strand of dna... but i have a feeling it probably wouldnt end up being enough 68.169.40.21 20:41, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Okay, I'm trying to stay out of this, but serious question here--how exactly does Ridley demonstrate standard "predatory behavior" there? He was running away. A bigger threat showed up. He stopped running away to single her out. That's not predatory behavior or instincts. That's either a vendetta or pure stupidity. You say he targeted her for being the biggest threat--why would he do that if he was already trying to flee from the smaller threats? Dazuro 21:11, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

i think youre confusing stuff... he doesnt run away or even try to until after the boss fight with him, not before. you know, the boss fight that starts after ridley sees samus and sets a trap for her? if he tried to run before, then why would he have engaged them in the first place?

you really gotta stop putting out all these theories without thinking about them dude... getting kinda out of hand 68.169.40.21 21:18, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

What? What trap? He engaged the troopers, ran away, saw Samus, leapt onto Samus, and called minions to keep the troopers off him. That's not a trap. Dazuro 21:20, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

let me explain this as best i can... remember how as little birdie, he lured the scientist into his pen? think, and im serious about that, of this like that, only hes getting the drop on her in more than one way (heehee)

also, to point out something wrong with your idea... why, and please answer this with a direct answer since youve been avoiding doing that for a while now... why would he engage the troops at all if he were just going to run away from them, and why would he not just jump through a wall to run away like he ultimately did, but instead move over the entrance to the building that samus had to come out of? 68.169.40.21 21:24, September 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree. Please, tell us how that works out. 89.145.83.41 21:27, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

He killed Lyle and then the others found him, obviously. Look, why are you arguing this? The fact is, we do not know 100% for sure whether he remembers or not. You cannot confirm it either way. We can say which is more likely for literally hours with any amount of backing scientific evidence or logic or cutscene dynamics, but it is impossible to know for sure. So the article can NOT remain in its current state, which says he does not remember. Get it through your head already. '''We do not know. Therefore, we can not say the answer is yes or no.''' No matter how much evidence you or I produce, it doesn't matter. We can only present the fact that it may be this, or it may be that. Dazuro 21:29, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

You're avoiding answering again and saying it doesn't matter because no one is sure. You keep putting out theories that you can't even back up. Can you even admit when you had a bad idea? He ran away but decided to come back when something that could kill him showed up, and he didn't play to set a trap when he had set a trap before, even though he SAW Samus coming down? Really? 89.145.83.41 21:36, September 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * hes right. you havent backed up one theory youve made with any kind of explanation yet on the basis that "no one knows for sure". ridley had laid a trap before, but you think he didnt when he so obviously moved into a position that was a trap just for samus, because if he had run away, he wouldnt be there 68.169.40.21 21:39, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Are you going out of your way to be difficult? Look, I told you, I have no evidence for how it works or why it works. The game doesn't say. But from the cutscenes it's heavily implied he does remember. I don't know how or why. Don't ask me for evidence of it. There is none. But the fact remains that the game implies that somehow, through science or magic or Plotonium itself, Ridley remembers. You cannot discount that possibility. There is no evidence that says it was a trap either. And yes, that's exactly my point--he ran away, but decided to come back when something that could kill him showed up. That's exactly how the scene goes. That is not predatory instinct. I don't know what it is. Maybe he's just stupid. Maybe he has no memories but his sadism wanted to torture the only female there. I don't know. No one does. I'm not trying to avoid answering anything, I'm saying that we can NOT say "this is true" when the game never says its true. Deal with it, that's how this wiki works. It's blatant unsourced unciteable speculation that he has no memories. Dazuro 21:40, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

The game is far too ambiguous for us to decide either way, and the article should reflect that.--AdmiralSakai 21:42, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Precisely. So let's just remove the statement entirely. It adds nothing to the article, and we're supposed to avoid putting speculation in articles either way. If it can't be cited, it is to be removed, and you will find nothing in the game explicitly saying that he does not remember her, nor that he does. Dazuro 21:45, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

dude, didnt you listen earlier. you want it to be implied. all that cutscene implies is that ridley is smart and can set a trap, like a really good predator. theres nothing about memories in taking out the biggest threat first... and there is evidence it was a trap. like its been said but so conveniently ignored with selective reading, if he wanted to run away, he would be gone. if he wanted to set a trap, hed move over the one place she had to come out of. that is predatory instinct, man. that is a trap. yet you discount this because he might remember her based on nothing... i feel sorry for you 68.169.40.21 21:49, September 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * 68, don't bother. He's gonna keep coming up with new theories based on nothing, and continue to refuse backing up any of these theories with even slivers of evidence. And then he'll just keep discounting any theories with plenty of evidence, like how he had set a trap for the biggest threat, just like he lured a scientist into his pen, or how he was so obviously cloned and didn't somehow just regenerate from some blood scraped off of Samus' armor. I have to agree with Extraxi now. He's just a tank-type troll. "I don't care if I'm not right, you're wrong."

89.145.83.41 21:53, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

You pity me for actually wanting to be open-minded about something? God, I'm such a poor unfortunate soul, looking at both sides of an issue instead of plugging my ears and pretending the other side isn't talking. Either way, you're--yet again--completely ignoring the fact that I'm not debating my side. I don't give a shit what you personally believe. It's completely irrelevant. The game left it open-ended. I'm not going to sit here arguing about which one is more likely. Give me a single ingame citation saying "he does not remember Mother Brain or Samus" and I'll gladly concede. Do it already and I'll gladly drop it. But no. You can't do that. Because the game doesn't say so. I don't care how much outside-the-game information you bring in about predation patterns and trap-setting habits. It's not ingame evidence. Stop avoiding the subject and give me ingame evidence, how does that sound for a change? It's a video game, after all! So we want information from the video game. Fancy that. Dazuro 21:55, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

makes sense, i guess... would explain why he refuses to explain out his own ideas and ignores evidence of any idea that isnt his... im guessing youre thinking dont feed the trolls, so ill probably go with you on that. but one last thing...

you cant look at both sides of an issue, yet debate only one. thats biase 68.169.40.21 21:58, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Why should I have to debate for your side? You've provided ample reasoning why it's plausible, even if I personally disagree. I have no problem having it on the page as long as we don't say it's the only possibility. But by all means, keep calling me a troll so you don't have to face your own logical shortcomings. It worked great for the last guy, too. Dazuro 22:01, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

grow up, kid... i mean youre not arguing your own side because you know itll come crumbling down 68.169.40.21 22:04, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Do clones have to look like the original?
Eh, I'm probably thinking this way to hard, but is the reason why Ridley looks so different in this game because he's a clone or something? Although, there was never a 3D fleshy Ridley, the one in Brawl seems to be what I'd expect Ridley to look in 3D and I'm not the only one who thinks so... I'm pretty sure its just the style they used for him, but part of me says that's not how the real Ridley would look. Dr.Pancake 03:33, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

That's how he looks in the flashback from the commercial. Dazuro 03:34, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

True, but the commercial is just a promotion of the game. I don't think they would completely change his look just because they wanted to show how the original Ridley would look during K-2L. Meh, I'm probably rethinking this way too much, I'm pretty sure its just the style they used for him. Dr.Pancake 03:40, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Look how different the Varia Suit looks now. They used that same design for the Mother Brain flashback. Artistic changes are artistic changes. That is all. Metroid's full of them. Dazuro 03:57, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I figured as much. We'll be seeing a lot more changes for sure in future games. I guess everyone has their own perspective of how Ridley looks. Just like Prime, the 2D games and Brawl have their own. Dr.Pancake 04:08, September 8, 2010 (UTC)