Template talk:Sourced name

Split?
I think we have enough pages in Category:Pages with sourced titles that this could warrant a discussion.

Should we split this into two different templates? As it currently stands, we use this template for two purposes: to label names from official guides (and other published media), and to label names from internal data. I feel like the latter could be given its own separate template and category, to make it clearer at a cursory glance whether the article's name stems from a publication or from internal data. --PeabodySam (talk) 15:07, August 25, 2018 (UTC)