I don't think that's a commando, ChozoBoy. Looks more like a Pirate Grenadier to me. HellKaiserryo12[ADMIN] (TalkContribs) 13:16, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

No,it's an aerotrooper. --DekutullaZM 15:49, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Aerotroopers don't have scythes. Either way it's not a Commando. HellKaiserryo12[ADMIN] (TalkContribs) 16:14, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
Either way, the previous image is fanart and tagged as such. Just don't add that one again. ChozoBoy [ADMIN] (Talk/Contribs) 19:26, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Pirate organization[]

Okay, this is all sorts of messed up. We stick Commando Pirates and Pirate Commandos together despite them being quite different. We separate Trooper Pirates from Pirate Troopers, when they're basically the same thing. Flying Pirates and Aerotroopers are completely identical, but they get two articles because of their names. I don't know what way we're going to stick with, but this inconsistency is ridiculous. Either we go on a per-type basis or a per-name basis. What'll it be, folks? Dazuro 23:29, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

I was unaware of the Commando thing before today. I'd thought the both had the same name. I would suggest splitting them all. When necessary, the articles could have a section describing the relation of the other subject. It can be as big or small as necessary. These are sort of evolutions in design of various units. Sort of like the line of Pirate turrets where each is described as succeeding the others specifically. ChozoBoy [ADMIN] (Talk/Contribs) 05:55, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

If only because the Commandos can't be the same kind of Commando due to their scan (one has been in existence for 10+ years, the other was created to hunt Samus, who I highly doubt has been fighting the pirates for ten years by that time), I'm inclined to agree. Except about Flying Pirates. Is there any difference between them and 2's Aerotroopers besides the model? Then 3's Aerotroopers had to come in and be completely different, having the same body shape as regular Troopers as well as brand new equipment... That's just a weird situation there. My gut tells me we should have one article for FP/AT and another for 3's ATs, except then we're splitting two things with the same name and lore while sticking two differently-named subjects together... argh. Damn you, Retro. Consistency, plz? K, thx. Dazuro 08:50, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Corruption Appearence[]

It doesn't have any info about Commandos in Corruption. WASSUP WIT DAT?

Sylux X 19:55, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

See above. The commandoes in corruption are Commando Pirates. The MarioGalaxy2433g5 {talk/contribs} 20:32, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Oh ok. Sylux X 03:05, March 24, 2012 (UTC)